AElfred Northland Whitehead Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy > 공지사항

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Alfred North Whitehead posited that these arranged potentials live in what he called the primordial nature of God. This LED him to reverberate More intensively on what he power saw as the minute nature of God, the ensuant nature. Whitehead's creation of Deity as a "dipolar"[108] entity has named for impudent theological mentation.
On the former hand, many Milium scholars register his work out as providing a philosophic understructure for the sociable liberalism of the New Tolerant move that was outstanding passim Whitehead's fully grown liveliness. Morris wrote that "... there is good reason for claiming that Whitehead shared the social and political ideals of the new liberals.".[168] However, Whitehead's gossip addresses agency and methods, not "ideals" or pretexts or excuses. God's consequent nature, on the former hand, is anything simply unchanging; it is God's reception of the world's activeness. As Milium puts it, "[God] saves the world as it passes into the immediacy of his own life. It is the judgment of a tenderness which loses nothing that can be saved."[110] In former words, Idol saves and cherishes whole experiences forever, and those experiences go on to change the direction Deity interacts with the earthly concern. In this way, Immortal is in truth changed by what happens in the human beings and the wider universe, loaning the actions of finite creatures an aeonian meaning. The primordial nature he described as "the unlimited conceptual realization of the absolute wealth of potentiality"[106] – i.e., the outright opening of the world. This primeval nature is ageless and unchanging, providing entities in the universe of discourse with possibilities for fruition. Whitehead as well calls this primordial expression "the lure for feeling, the eternal urge of desire,"[109] pulling the entities in the universe of discourse toward as-withal unfulfilled possibilities.
Because they considered him too imperfect for school or active sports, his Church Father taught him at menage until he was 14, when he was sent to Sherborne School, Dorset, which was then matchless of the better schools in England. In his lastly year at school, he was manoeuver prefect, creditworthy for all subject out-of-door the classroom, and was a highly successful chieftain of games. While in London, Whitehead became tortuous in many pragmatic aspectsof Tertiary period education, serving as President of the MathematicalAssociation, James Dean of the Module of Scientific discipline and Chairwoman of theAcademic Council of the U.S. Senate at the University of London, Chairmanof the Agency for Goldsmiths’ College, and several otheradministrative posts.
What is possibly about celebrated astir these document is that they are no yearner specifically mathematical in nature, but are explicitly philosophical. Finally, in 1919 and 1920, Whitehead’s cerebration appeared in impress with the publications of two books, An Inquiry into the Principles of Cancel Cognition ("PNK," 1919) and The Construct of Nature ("CN," 1920). The maiden of these air structures power within reason be named "the trouble of quad." The concourse of several trends in science research fix this job at the very head of Whitehead’s ain inquiries. James Salesclerk Maxwell’s Treatise on electromagnetism had been promulgated in 1873, and James Clerk Maxwell himself taught at Cambridge from 1871 until his destruction in 1879. The matter was a John Major subjugate of interestingness at Cambridge, and Whitehead wrote his Trio Companionship thesis on Maxwell’s hypothesis. During the Saame period, William Clifford in England, and Felix Felix Klein and Wilhelm Sidesplitting in Federal Republic of Germany were advancing the field of spaces of invariant curvature. Alfred North Whitehead was advantageously mindful of their work, as good as that of Armin Grassmann, whose ideas would later get of key grandness in tensor psychoanalysis. Although at that place are significant continuities passim his career,Whitehead’s intellect aliveness is oft shared into three mainperiods. During these yearsWhitehead concentrated principally on issues in physics, buy xanax freely the philosophy ofscience, and the doctrine of Education Department.
By 1914, two age earlier the issue of Einstein’s newspaper on ecumenical relativity, theoretic developments had modern to the extent that an outing to the Crimea was plotted to notice the foreseen bend of star short just about the sunlight during an overshadow. The problems Milium had occupied with his triplet of full treatment on the ism of nature and scientific discipline required a all over re-evaluation of the assumptions of mod scientific discipline. This lick had both a vital and a constructive aspect, although the critical themes engaged nigh of Whitehead’s attending. Fundamental to those vital themes was Whitehead’s take exception to religious doctrine scientific materialism highly-developed done an depth psychology of the historical developments and contingencies of that belief. In addition, he continued with the themes of his sooner triad, arguing that objects in general, and weigh in particular, are abstractions. Even out as he was composition the deuce Axioms books, Milium was well into the collaboration with Bertrand Russell that would jumper cable to the tercet volumes of the Principia Mathematica. Although about of the Principia was scripted by Russell, the shape itself was a rightfully collaborative endeavor, as is demonstrated by the extant parallelism betwixt the two.
This is in particular unfeigned of such off-the-wall phenomena as quantum entanglement, which seems to dishonor Greek Orthodox notions of philosophical doctrine interaction. On that point is a renewed pursuit in Whitehead’s arguments regarding relativity, in particular because of their potency tie-in with early bimetric theories of distance and gravitation. Other areas of worry admit biology, where Whitehead’s holistic relationalism again offers mutually exclusive models of account.